
As per the heading; many residents of Stanton Wick and Stanton Drew have formed a local action group to oppose the B&NES proposal to use what was Pensford Colliery as a properly designated site for Gypsies and travellers.
Personally my views regarding this are mixed. I fully support the idea of providing properly managed sites for travellers and recognise that it is likely that wherever the council look at a potential site there will be objections for nearby residents for many reasons; this makes the scheme very difficult indeed and the fact of the matter is that they do need to go somewhere and the concept of providing legal sites is a realistic and potentially workable measure to provide living space for one of the most discriminated against communities in society and also in an attempt to cut down on the problem of illegal pitches appearing on private land across the country.
However, on the other hand I can see some genuine planning related reasons why this is not the best of sites. For example; the site is in the green belt and a traveller’s pitch could detract from the openness of the environment. Seeing as Filer’s Coaches are struggling to gain permission for a few extra coaches it would seem rather hypocritical in that case to then allow a permanent traveller’s site next door. Also you could argue that the site is too far from any real infrastructure to support it. Stanton Wick is also a very small hamlet and such a site could easily over whelm it and cause a lot of traffic on the very narrow country lanes.
I am also concerned for the welfare of the traveller’s themself seeing as a previous inspection of this land reveiled significant arsenic contamination.
I am keen to listen to the views of local people on the issue. Any comments or suggestions based on prejudice or stereotyping of these people from anyone are of no interest to me. However if residents wish to highlight any genuine planning related matters then these will certainly be taken into consideration.
At the cabinet meeting on May 9th I will be echoing the concerns of residents which I represent on an official and formal level. The outcome of the meeting is the decision whether or not to go to full consultation on these proposed sites; not whether or not to go straight ahead with the proposal. Even then after any consultation period I have been advised that it will still need to go through the regular planning process (i.e. scrutinised by officers and determined by the development control committee).
Overall my views are; nice idea, but wrong site and environment and I will be working alongside Stanton Drew Parish Council and local residents to put the necessary points and pressure forward to the B&NES cabinet in order to persuade them to rethink this proposal.